Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,789
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 4:
Line 4: + +
→"Beautiful, but not robust" Quote: reply
Given that, I propose the quote be removed, since its likely meaning is out of context with the way the quote is being used. --[[User:Lemonpeel|Lemonpeel]] 12:00, 15 June 2009 (EDT)
Given that, I propose the quote be removed, since its likely meaning is out of context with the way the quote is being used. --[[User:Lemonpeel|Lemonpeel]] 12:00, 15 June 2009 (EDT)
:The quote speaks for itself, and your comment is unfortunately incoherent. A lack of robustness in a theory is obviously a weakness in the theory, not in the requirements for the theory. No, we're not going to censor the quote.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 17:51, 15 June 2009 (EDT)
== Mass Increase Section ==
== Mass Increase Section ==