Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
no edit summary
Line 30: Line 30:  
::::I agree 100%, I forgot my 'yes' at the end of my last statement. Sorry to hear about the job, certainly not good news. I'll be praying for you this week, new employment at the same pay scale. --[[User:Jpatt|jpatt]] 23:36, 19 February 2009 (EST)
 
::::I agree 100%, I forgot my 'yes' at the end of my last statement. Sorry to hear about the job, certainly not good news. I'll be praying for you this week, new employment at the same pay scale. --[[User:Jpatt|jpatt]] 23:36, 19 February 2009 (EST)
 
:::::Thanks for the kind thoughts - being cut in a weak economy isn't fun, but this happened once before to me in the 1990's and the job I landed in turned out to be better than the one I was laid off from.  My hope isn't so much for a job with the same pay, but one that doesn't cost me time with my family.  I have some special-needs kids, and I'd take a pay cut to be able to telecommute or work on flex-time as I do now to be there when they need me.  The companies that offer this will be rewarded by incredibly loyal employees.  --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 23:47, 19 February 2009 (EST)
 
:::::Thanks for the kind thoughts - being cut in a weak economy isn't fun, but this happened once before to me in the 1990's and the job I landed in turned out to be better than the one I was laid off from.  My hope isn't so much for a job with the same pay, but one that doesn't cost me time with my family.  I have some special-needs kids, and I'd take a pay cut to be able to telecommute or work on flex-time as I do now to be there when they need me.  The companies that offer this will be rewarded by incredibly loyal employees.  --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 23:47, 19 February 2009 (EST)
 +
 +
Doesn't anybody read Kant anymore? Helloooo, categorical imperative? [[User:Ckral|Ckral]]
    
==No, it is not possible==
 
==No, it is not possible==
2

edits

Navigation menu