Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,790
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 14:
Line 14: + + + + + +
reply re: Witten
::So if you don't win a Nobel prize, you're not a physicist? By the way, I take it from your source that you were unable to find that kind of detailed information on these pages.--[[User:Lemonpeel|Lemonpeel]] 18:19, 16 June 2009 (EDT)
::So if you don't win a Nobel prize, you're not a physicist? By the way, I take it from your source that you were unable to find that kind of detailed information on these pages.--[[User:Lemonpeel|Lemonpeel]] 18:19, 16 June 2009 (EDT)
:::Witten seems to be a [[Richard Dawkins]]-type. In fact, both hold (or held) non-academic positions established by the billionaire Charles Simonyi. Those Simonyi positions, in my opinion, are not real peer-reviewed professorships.
:::The Craaford Prize looks like a real liberal honor, judging by who else received it.
:::The point is simply this: has Witten ever even conducted a college-level physics experiment? Let the record reflect that as a history major he may not have, and I doubt he has since.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 18:30, 16 June 2009 (EDT)
== String theory "unrelated" to known forces in nature? ==
== String theory "unrelated" to known forces in nature? ==