Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
236 bytes added ,  01:03, June 17, 2009
→‎A Total Failure: it has generated some interesting math
Line 1: Line 1:  
== A Total Failure ==
 
== A Total Failure ==
 
I removed the blatantly untrue sentence "M Theory is a total failure". Many of the dualities that comprise M-theory have been verified mathematically. A fundamental goal of M-theory is to unite the existing and various versions of super-string theory. This project is far from complete, but nor is it a "total failure". It's an on-going topic of research.--[[User:Lemonpeel|Lemonpeel]] 20:39, 16 June 2009 (EDT)
 
I removed the blatantly untrue sentence "M Theory is a total failure". Many of the dualities that comprise M-theory have been verified mathematically. A fundamental goal of M-theory is to unite the existing and various versions of super-string theory. This project is far from complete, but nor is it a "total failure". It's an on-going topic of research.--[[User:Lemonpeel|Lemonpeel]] 20:39, 16 June 2009 (EDT)
 +
 +
: I agree that M-theory is not a total failure, because it has generated some interesting math. However as a unified field theory to explain the forces of nature, it is a failure. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 21:03, 16 June 2009 (EDT)

Navigation menu