28
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 173:
Line 173: +
→Examples of Bias in Conservapedia
15. There are many more examples of these biased articles, all you have to do is look around. I encourage others who are outraged at the complete inaccuracy of these articles, and complete lack of anything even remotely non-Christian, non-Creationist, non-Conservative, and non-American, to add more examples to this list to show that Conservapedia is much more biased than Wikipedia, which it is attempting to "fix".
15. There are many more examples of these biased articles, all you have to do is look around. I encourage others who are outraged at the complete inaccuracy of these articles, and complete lack of anything even remotely non-Christian, non-Creationist, non-Conservative, and non-American, to add more examples to this list to show that Conservapedia is much more biased than Wikipedia, which it is attempting to "fix".
16. Conservapedia attempts to look like a 'real encyclopedia' by avoiding gossip, as seen in [[Differences with Wikipedia]], while featuring articles such as [[Examples of Bias in Wikipedia]] and the [[Wikipedia]] article (an unencyclopedic entry consisting of gossip about Wikipedia).
== Note on item 5. of the list on bias ==
== Note on item 5. of the list on bias ==