SkipCaptcha
710
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 31:
Line 31: + + +
vandalism?
The current article lacks a coherent direction and reads like a trivia list along the lines of "here's some stuff that has something to do with physics." It erroneously states that the field began with Galileo. Newton's law of gravitation is a very specific application and, IMO, should not be stated within the first few paragraphs of an article on a vast subject. Furthermore, an entire paragraph is devoted to mostly to [[calculus]] and not to physics. I've started working on an outline of a compete rewrite [[User:Bayes/Physics_draft|here]]. If there are no objections, I'd like to replace the current version with that one in the very near future.--[[User:Bayes|Bayes]] 16:40, 22 July 2007 (EDT)
The current article lacks a coherent direction and reads like a trivia list along the lines of "here's some stuff that has something to do with physics." It erroneously states that the field began with Galileo. Newton's law of gravitation is a very specific application and, IMO, should not be stated within the first few paragraphs of an article on a vast subject. Furthermore, an entire paragraph is devoted to mostly to [[calculus]] and not to physics. I've started working on an outline of a compete rewrite [[User:Bayes/Physics_draft|here]]. If there are no objections, I'd like to replace the current version with that one in the very near future.--[[User:Bayes|Bayes]] 16:40, 22 July 2007 (EDT)
==Vandalism?==
What was wrong with Quetzalcoatl's contributions to this page? There were a couple things I'd change, and it's worth discussing whether Islamic physics during the Middle Ages merits mention here, but the edits were generally sensible and certainly looked well-intentioned... --[[User:MarkGall|MarkGall]] 18:45, 21 June 2009 (EDT)