Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
367 bytes added ,  21:22, June 24, 2009
black holes are not falsifiable, and thus not really scientific, yet remain a popular topic for magazines, the NYT, and armchair followers of science
Line 1: Line 1:  +
A '''black hole''' is a theoretical prediction of the [[theory of relativity]].  It is impossible to prove that a black hole does not exist, and thus it fails the [[falsifiability]] requirement of science.  Nevertheless, the theoretical black hole remains a popular topic for magazines, the science page of the [[New York Times]], and armchair followers of science.
 +
 
[[Image:Iu8969hu.jpg|right|thumb|300px|Artist's conception of a binary system consisting of a black hole and a main sequence star.  The black hole is drawing matter from the main sequence star via an [[accretion disk]] around it, and some of this matter forms a gas jet.]]
 
[[Image:Iu8969hu.jpg|right|thumb|300px|Artist's conception of a binary system consisting of a black hole and a main sequence star.  The black hole is drawing matter from the main sequence star via an [[accretion disk]] around it, and some of this matter forms a gas jet.]]
 
==Nature of a Black Hole==
 
==Nature of a Black Hole==
Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,789

edits

Navigation menu