1
edit
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 85:
Line 85: + + + +
→The falsfiability section makes no sense: new section
::: There are no particles predicted by string theory, and there is no way to falsify string theory no matter how big the accelerators are. There is no possibility that string theory will ever be validated. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 19:22, 16 June 2009 (EDT)
::: There are no particles predicted by string theory, and there is no way to falsify string theory no matter how big the accelerators are. There is no possibility that string theory will ever be validated. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 19:22, 16 June 2009 (EDT)
== The falsfiability section makes no sense ==
"String theory proponent Michio Kaku replies to this glaring defect by stating that string theory may be "too robust" because it is not falsifiable, an obvious non sequitur. " I don't understand this. In the parlance of physics robust is the opposite of falsifiable, so its not so much a response to the glaring defect as pointing it out. and why is there no reference for this quote? --[[User:Alaskan|Alaskan]] 20:31, 24 June 2009 (EDT)