Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
347 bytes added ,  17:09, June 25, 2009
reply re: decay rate
Line 22: Line 22:     
::::You wrote "Continental drift must have slowed down over time." Why ''must'' it have? Also, if there is actually evidence showing non-constant rates for any of the processes dicussed above, then they should be cited in the article. [[User:AddisonDM|AddisonDM]] 11:35, 25 June 2009 (EDT)
 
::::You wrote "Continental drift must have slowed down over time." Why ''must'' it have? Also, if there is actually evidence showing non-constant rates for any of the processes dicussed above, then they should be cited in the article. [[User:AddisonDM|AddisonDM]] 11:35, 25 June 2009 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::::'''Entropy''' is one reason why.  Perpetual machines are impossible for the same reason.  Lower energy is another reason.  Friction is pertinent to continental drift.  There are many manifestations of the basic phenomenon.  It's silly for Old Earthers to pretend it doesn't exist.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 13:09, 25 June 2009 (EDT)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,231

edits

Navigation menu