5
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 95:
Line 95: + +
→The falsfiability section makes no sense
:::But the point of the quote and its absurdity remains: it seems to me that Kaku thought a lack of falsifiability is a sign of robustness! That sentiment sums up the string theorists well, I'm afraid.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 22:00, 24 June 2009 (EDT)
:::But the point of the quote and its absurdity remains: it seems to me that Kaku thought a lack of falsifiability is a sign of robustness! That sentiment sums up the string theorists well, I'm afraid.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 22:00, 24 June 2009 (EDT)
::::Well I looked in the history and there was a link straight to the audio interview and you can listen to him say it, I would add the source back in but I'm visually impaired and I've already called my son in twice today to do captchas for me. I really don't think Kaku meant the robust comment to be a positive thing. --[[User:AlanN|AlanN]] 18:01, 26 June 2009 (EDT)--[[User:AlanN|AlanN]] 18:01, 26 June 2009 (EDT)