5
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 99:
Line 99: + +
→The falsfiability section makes no sense
:::::Saying something is "too robust" is not a positive thing??? It's certainly not a harsh criticism; perhaps it could be some kind of backhanded compliment. I don't think it's a complaint about the lack of [[falsifiability]] of string theory.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 18:18, 26 June 2009 (EDT)
:::::Saying something is "too robust" is not a positive thing??? It's certainly not a harsh criticism; perhaps it could be some kind of backhanded compliment. I don't think it's a complaint about the lack of [[falsifiability]] of string theory.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 18:18, 26 June 2009 (EDT)
::::::In physics robust is not a compliment, their jargon uses robust as a negative attribute. --[[User:AlanN|AlanN]] 23:56, 26 June 2009 (EDT)