3
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 52:
Line 52: + + + + + +
Conservapedia talk:Guidelines (view source)
Revision as of 01:44, June 30, 2009
, 01:44, June 30, 2009→90/10 rule
What is Aschlafly's ratio in regards to talk pages/actual edits? [[User:OtherSide|OtherSide]] 20:21, 11 September 2008 (EDT)
What is Aschlafly's ratio in regards to talk pages/actual edits? [[User:OtherSide|OtherSide]] 20:21, 11 September 2008 (EDT)
:it would surprise me if it did not meet the 90/10 rule, he does a lot of reverts. --[[User:Brendanw|Brendanw]] 23:50, 16 November 2008 (EST)
:it would surprise me if it did not meet the 90/10 rule, he does a lot of reverts. --[[User:Brendanw|Brendanw]] 23:50, 16 November 2008 (EST)
I don't know if anyone else has experienced this, but my problem with the 90/10 rule is that so often what seems to be an innocuous edit is reverted, requiring a lengthy discussion. This often means I must either:
(a) let it lie, and therefore not make any useful contribution, or
(b) debate the issue, thereby skewing my talk : edit ratio!
I'm not talking about vandalism or provocation, either. I mean definitions of the 'young adult' demographic in publishing and redirects for The Metropolitan Museum Of Art. The mind boggles. [[User:Scoresby|Scoresby]] 21:44, 29 June 2009 (EDT)
== Sources ==
== Sources ==