Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
267 bytes added ,  14:07, June 30, 2009
added more evidence that this is destructive
Line 5: Line 5:  
The whole language approach is criticized by many [[conservative]]s and [[homeschooling|homeschoolers]], who prefer the phonics method. <ref>"The Phonics vs. 'Whole Language' Controversy", Onkar Ghate, ''Capitalism Magazine'' (February 25, 2005), http://www.capmag.com/articlePrint.asp?ID=4151</ref>  
 
The whole language approach is criticized by many [[conservative]]s and [[homeschooling|homeschoolers]], who prefer the phonics method. <ref>"The Phonics vs. 'Whole Language' Controversy", Onkar Ghate, ''Capitalism Magazine'' (February 25, 2005), http://www.capmag.com/articlePrint.asp?ID=4151</ref>  
   −
Indeed, this criticism is in part because [[leftist]] and cultural [[Marxist]] publications have lauded the whole language method as part of the broader changes which took hold after the 1960s; as the avowedly [[socialist]] ''Monthly Review'' puts it, "during the Vietnam era when campuses and high-schools broke into open-rebellion and, as a collateral result, critical pedagogy, whole language reading programs, inter-active, investigatory teaching gained a foothold..."<ref>"Notes from the Editors", ''Monthly Review'' Volume 60, Number 5, http://monthlyreview.org/nfte081001.php</ref>.
+
Indeed, this criticism is in part because [[leftist]] and cultural [[Marxist]] publications have lauded the whole language method as part of the broader changes which took hold after the 1960s; as the avowedly [[socialist]] ''Monthly Review'' puts it, "during the Vietnam era when campuses and high-schools broke into open-rebellion and, as a collateral result, critical pedagogy, whole language reading programs, inter-active, investigatory teaching gained a foothold ..."<ref>"Notes from the Editors", ''Monthly Review'' Volume 60, Number 5, http://monthlyreview.org/nfte081001.php</ref>.
    
The "whole language" or "look-say" method became trendy in the United States following [[World War II]].  [[Rudolf Flesch]] was an early and influential critic of "whole language" teaching methods in his 1955 book ''Why Johnny Can't Read''.<ref>Flesch, Rudolf.  ''Why Johnny Can't Read: And What You Can Do About It''.</ref>  Flesch advocated a return to [[phonics]].
 
The "whole language" or "look-say" method became trendy in the United States following [[World War II]].  [[Rudolf Flesch]] was an early and influential critic of "whole language" teaching methods in his 1955 book ''Why Johnny Can't Read''.<ref>Flesch, Rudolf.  ''Why Johnny Can't Read: And What You Can Do About It''.</ref>  Flesch advocated a return to [[phonics]].
 +
 +
Dr. Louisa C. Moats observed that whole language reading "lives on," despite documented evidence that its approach is a primary reason why the standardized reading scores of public school students remain abysmal.<ref>http://www.nrrf.org/review_moats_5-01.htm</ref>
    
==See also==
 
==See also==
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,483

edits

Navigation menu