Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
60 bytes added ,  05:13, July 1, 2009
Line 32: Line 32:  
Why the reversion?  Surely animal cruelty is the same no matter which religion is responsible for it?  The halal article mentions cruelty, so why not kosher?
 
Why the reversion?  Surely animal cruelty is the same no matter which religion is responsible for it?  The halal article mentions cruelty, so why not kosher?
   −
Quite honestly, I think its nonsense. It's definitely less cruel than running around shooting deer. It shoudl just be removed from the halal article.
+
:Quite honestly, I think its nonsense. It's definitely less cruel than running around shooting deer. It shoudl just be removed from the halal article.--[[User:Redsox70707|Redsox70707]] 01:13, 1 July 2009 (EDT)
44

edits

Navigation menu