17,394
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 145:
Line 145: + + + +
→radical?: new section
*The Coleman article is. The Democrat machine is contesting, so is Coleman, irregularities. It is in the courts now. --[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 23:00, 29 January 2009 (EST)
*The Coleman article is. The Democrat machine is contesting, so is Coleman, irregularities. It is in the courts now. --[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 23:00, 29 January 2009 (EST)
== radical? ==
Is Franken a radical? he may turn out to be one in the future but the article completely neglects his political views. He has not taken any notable radical positions so far. [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 18:31, 1 July 2009 (EDT)