4
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 31:
Line 31: + + + + + + + +
→Deleted anti-British rant: new section
Also, what is so "archaic" about British spellings and usages? If they really were "archaic" is it not right to say then that many American spellings and usages are equally as "archaic" as the British ones? [[User:MatthewR|MatthewR]] 23:16, 1 July 2009 (EDT)
Also, what is so "archaic" about British spellings and usages? If they really were "archaic" is it not right to say then that many American spellings and usages are equally as "archaic" as the British ones? [[User:MatthewR|MatthewR]] 23:16, 1 July 2009 (EDT)
== Deleted anti-British rant ==
''As American society became more productive and efficient than the British, Americans began to emphasize economy in language also...''
I have removed this statement as it sounds like an anti-British rant.
Also, what is so "archaic" about British spellings and usages? If they really were "archaic" is it not right to say then that many American spellings and usages are equally as "archaic" as the British ones? [[User:MatthewR|MatthewR]] 23:17, 1 July 2009 (EDT)