Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
23 bytes removed ,  07:10, March 27, 2007
no edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:  
Godel's work abruptly ended a half-century of attempts, beginning with the work of Frege and culminating in Principia Mathematica and Hilbert's formalism, to find a set of axioms sufficient to prove the consistency of all mathematics. The incompleteness theorems also imply that not all mathematical questions are computable.
 
Godel's work abruptly ended a half-century of attempts, beginning with the work of Frege and culminating in Principia Mathematica and Hilbert's formalism, to find a set of axioms sufficient to prove the consistency of all mathematics. The incompleteness theorems also imply that not all mathematical questions are computable.
   −
This demonstrated the folly of the work of several leaders in the field.  [[Bertrand Russell]] had already published, in Principia Mathematica (1910-13), a massive attempt to axiomatize mathematics.  Gödel's proof also showed that the formalist approach of [[David Hilbert]] was bound to fail to prove consistency.
+
This demonstrated the folly of the work of several leaders in the field.  [[Bertrand Russell]] had already published, in Principia Mathematica (1910-13), a massive attempt to axiomatize mathematics.  Gödel's proof also showed that the formalist approach of [[David Hilbert]] can not succeed.
    
Gödel's proof was a landmark for mathematics, demonstrated that it can never be a finished project as many mathematicians had believed.   
 
Gödel's proof was a landmark for mathematics, demonstrated that it can never be a finished project as many mathematicians had believed.   
6,068

edits

Navigation menu