Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,795
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 290:
Line 290: + + + + + +
→Liberal Rant: reply to rant
So my question is this... if Mr Schafly doesn't censor the truth, then why exactly does he delete well referenced points solely on the basis that he thinks they are 'liberal'?
So my question is this... if Mr Schafly doesn't censor the truth, then why exactly does he delete well referenced points solely on the basis that he thinks they are 'liberal'?
:Your posting doesn't tell the whole story. I personally invited you to discuss and debate this here. Instead, you've gone into a rant. I doubt you've even read or critically examined the articles that you claim are "scholarly".
:[[Wikipedia]] will unthinkingly post material from liberal sources as though it must be true. We don't do that here. If the New York Times claimed that 2+2=5, we would not repeat that falsehood as Wikipedia might.
:I welcome an open-minded discussion about the illogical claim that guns, which are overwhelmingly defensive, somehow increase crime. So far, you haven't shown an interest in open-minded discussion.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 12:08, 5 July 2009 (EDT)