| Line 90: |
Line 90: |
| | ==Consciousness== | | ==Consciousness== |
| | | | |
| − | * Nature consists of a finite number of elements | + | * Nature consists of a finite number of elements. |
| − | * We (our physical bodies) consist of those elements | + | * We (our physical bodies) consist of those elements. |
| − | * The elements themselves in which we consist of, and nature itself, has no consciousness | + | * The elements themselves which we consist of, and nature itself, have no consciousness. |
| − | * Despite our elements themselves not having a conscience, We do have consciousness (in our soul or whatever you want to call it) | + | * Despite our elements themselves having no consciousness, we do. |
| | * Consciousness can not happen by chance, therefore there must be a being who supply that to us. | | * Consciousness can not happen by chance, therefore there must be a being who supply that to us. |
| − | * It's not logical to have an infinite regress of beings, therefore we posit a single, uncaused Causer of the conscience | + | * Infinite regress of beings is illogical, therefore a single, uncaused causer must be the causer of consciousness. |
| − | * This uncaused Causer of the conscience is [[God]] | + | * This uncaused causer of the conscience is [[God]] |
| | + | |
| | + | ==Objections== |
| | + | |
| | + | * This argument fails to address [[gestalt consciousness]]. |
| | + | * [[Evolutionists]] typically argue that consciousness may happen by chance, and that for this reason, the argument is invalid. |
| | + | * Infinite regress is allowable both in modern mathematics and physics. |
| | + | * The last point (that the uncaused causer is God) is unsupported unless it is taken as a statement of definition. If this is the case, the prior arguments are unnecessary. |
| | | | |
| | ==Resources== | | ==Resources== |