24
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: +
no edit summary
The date of 600 A.D. given is obviously nonsense since this is the Old Testament. [http://www.angelfire.com/ego/et_deo/highpriests.wps.htm This site] doesn't appear too trustworthy, but its guess of 700 B.C. is better than what's up now, so I'm changing it until someone finds a proper source. --[[User:MarkGall|MarkGall]] 17:08, 7 July 2009 (EDT)
The date of 600 A.D. given is obviously nonsense since this is the Old Testament. [http://www.angelfire.com/ego/et_deo/highpriests.wps.htm This site] doesn't appear too trustworthy, but its guess of 700 B.C. is better than what's up now, so I'm changing it until someone finds a proper source. --[[User:MarkGall|MarkGall]] 17:08, 7 July 2009 (EDT)
:Thanks for clearing that up! --[[User:TimothyN|TimothyN]] 17:10, 7 July 2009 (EDT)