nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
26,487
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 173:
Line 173: + + + + + +
→An interesting mission.....: new section
::Sigh. Daniel, you know I admire your abilities, and how throughly you document your additions, right? In today's world, with literally the barbarians at the gate, wanting to destroy Christianity, and the entire western world, do you really think this is the time to hone your skills on how different Christian's are from each other? Or would you be willing to concede that perhaps for the good of all, that isn't of the greatest import right now? Don't you think Jesus would prefer us concentrating on the positive, how we are all alike, how we should join together to defeat the agents of Satan? I know I am clear in my heart what He would like from us....I pray you are too. --[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 00:43, 11 July 2009 (EDT)
::Sigh. Daniel, you know I admire your abilities, and how throughly you document your additions, right? In today's world, with literally the barbarians at the gate, wanting to destroy Christianity, and the entire western world, do you really think this is the time to hone your skills on how different Christian's are from each other? Or would you be willing to concede that perhaps for the good of all, that isn't of the greatest import right now? Don't you think Jesus would prefer us concentrating on the positive, how we are all alike, how we should join together to defeat the agents of Satan? I know I am clear in my heart what He would like from us....I pray you are too. --[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 00:43, 11 July 2009 (EDT)
== An interesting mission..... ==
I have an article I don't quite know what to do with....
[[Last_Thursdayism]] is pretty much a useless piece of junk, as it is. Looking at the history it was originally created by vandal site members, and I suppose was intended to be a clever piece of parody. It isn't. They were going for something on the ''Omphalos Hypothesis'', and attaching a too pop culture name to it. [http://books.google.com/books?id=acwQAAAAIAAJ Omphalos: An Attempt to Untie the Geological Knot], written by Philip H. Gosse, a Creationist, was his attempt to explain some technical points of Creation. His effort preceded Darwin's own, opposite hypothesis by several years, as I remember. I propose to re-name the article to "Omphalos". If you are versed in this topic, or it interests you, could you please flesh this out, and I will then move it to a more correct title? Thanks, Daniel. --[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 13:10, 11 July 2009 (EDT)