Block
1,976
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 2:
Line 2: +
Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 20:55, July 14, 2009
, 20:55, July 14, 2009Don't dare to hint that Al Gore lied.
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
#Noting that Al Gore's 2009 statement that he won a 2007 British court case about [[An Inconvenient Truth]] ran contrary to the actual ruling and, especially, the judge's statement that the claimant won the case against the film is considered "original research" and "POV" on Wikipedia.<ref>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dimmock_v_Secretary_of_State_for_Education_and_Skills&diff=302098981&oldid=302092626</ref>
#[[Wikipedia]] often treats [[conservative]] figures and sites with contempt, characteristic of the liberal [[double standard]]. Compare, for example, Wikipedia's smear of Conservapedia<ref>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservapedia</ref> with its straightforward description of Scholarpedia.<ref>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scholarpedia</ref>
#[[Wikipedia]] often treats [[conservative]] figures and sites with contempt, characteristic of the liberal [[double standard]]. Compare, for example, Wikipedia's smear of Conservapedia<ref>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservapedia</ref> with its straightforward description of Scholarpedia.<ref>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scholarpedia</ref>
#[[Wikipedia]] completely omits [[Conservapedia]] from Wikipedia's ranking of the largest wikis,<ref>http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_wikis</ref> even though Conservapedia easily qualifies. Wikipedia's [[censorship]] of Conservapedia from that entry remains even after the exposure of this bias.
#[[Wikipedia]] completely omits [[Conservapedia]] from Wikipedia's ranking of the largest wikis,<ref>http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_wikis</ref> even though Conservapedia easily qualifies. Wikipedia's [[censorship]] of Conservapedia from that entry remains even after the exposure of this bias.