Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
fix cite
Line 1: Line 1: −
In ''Diamond v. Chakrabarty'', 447 U.S. 303, 309 (1980), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] extended patent protection to new forms of life.  The Court relied on the legislative history, noting that the drafters of 35 U.S.C. § 101 intended "to 'include anything under the sun that is made by man.'"  ''Id.'' at 309 (quoting S. REP. NO. 1979, 82d Cong., 2d Sess. 5 (1952); and H.R. REP. NO. 1923, 82d Cong., 2d Sess. 6 (1952)).
+
In ''Diamond v. Chakrabarty'', 447 U.S. 303 (1980), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] extended patent protection to new forms of life.  The Court relied on the legislative history, noting that the drafters of 35 U.S.C. § 101 intended "to 'include anything under the sun that is made by man.'"  ''Id.'' at 309 (quoting S. REP. NO. 1979, 82d Cong., 2d Sess. 5 (1952); and H.R. REP. NO. 1923, 82d Cong., 2d Sess. 6 (1952)).
    
Patents are granted today for genetic material, though the [[ACLU]] challenged this practice with a lawsuit in 2009.
 
Patents are granted today for genetic material, though the [[ACLU]] challenged this practice with a lawsuit in 2009.
 
[[Category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
 
[[Category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
 
[[category:patent law]]
 
[[category:patent law]]
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,204

edits

Navigation menu