Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 231: Line 231:  
I don't seek a confrontation, you are a valued contributor, but Chip, Ronald Reagan was not a Fiscal Conservative?  That edit, and some other recent ones of yours that I have reverted, make me think you are sourcing liberals for that kind of revisionist thinking!  --[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 22:31, 18 July 2009 (EDT)
 
I don't seek a confrontation, you are a valued contributor, but Chip, Ronald Reagan was not a Fiscal Conservative?  That edit, and some other recent ones of yours that I have reverted, make me think you are sourcing liberals for that kind of revisionist thinking!  --[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 22:31, 18 July 2009 (EDT)
   −
TK, there's no sarcasm here, but when you asked the question "Ronald Reagan was not a Fiscal Conservative?" that sounds as if your saying I wrote that Ronald Reagan was not a fiscal conservative. Then a user who has a history of committing vandalism took my edit off, and you changed it back. Just what are you implying?
+
TK, there's no sarcasm here, but when you asked the question "Ronald Reagan was not a Fiscal Conservative?" that sounds as if your saying I wrote that Ronald Reagan was not a fiscal conservative, I wrote that he is. Then a user who has a history of committing vandalism took my edit off, and you changed it back. Just what are you implying? Also, I checked out your recent contributions and you have not reverted any of my edits. Is this for real or is this some kind of a joke?[[User:Chippeterson|Chippeterson]] July 18, 2009
Siteadmin, oversight, Administrators
5,098

edits

Navigation menu