191
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 12:
Line 12: +
no edit summary
Your contributions seem sloppy and aimless. I'm thinking of reverting them all. Please explain what you are doing here. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 10:03, 27 March 2007 (EDT)
Your contributions seem sloppy and aimless. I'm thinking of reverting them all. Please explain what you are doing here. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 10:03, 27 March 2007 (EDT)
*Please stop inserting red blocks with misspelled word and 'dig' about conservative POV, pending an explanation. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 10:05, 27 March 2007 (EDT)
*Please stop inserting red blocks with misspelled word and 'dig' about conservative POV, pending an explanation. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 10:05, 27 March 2007 (EDT)
:Well I have to admit Ed, I'm slightly offended that you think my contributions are sloppy and aimless, but thanks for bringing it to my attention. Perhaps you would like to go into a bit more detail and suggest potential areas for improvement? I'm currently working on a template called [[Template:vandalcandidate]], which should serve as a useful template to put on controvertial articles, to warn readers that the article at any given time is not necessarily representative of the conservative position, due to the relentless vandals that some of the more controvertial articles on this site seem to attract. [[User:Ilikebigbibles|Ilikebigbibles]] 10:08, 27 March 2007 (EDT)