3
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 109:
Line 109: +
→2009
The 2009 paragraph is tat. Just a bunch of random facts that are only notable because they are recent. The relevant facts would be better merged into sections about Republican history in the senate, Republican opinion polls, and possibly into the page on Obama. [[User:Concernedchris|Concernedchris]] 10:08, 9 July 2009 (EDT)
The 2009 paragraph is tat. Just a bunch of random facts that are only notable because they are recent. The relevant facts would be better merged into sections about Republican history in the senate, Republican opinion polls, and possibly into the page on Obama. [[User:Concernedchris|Concernedchris]] 10:08, 9 July 2009 (EDT)
::I disagree. The paragraph is a good summary of the state of the GOP today. [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 17:43, 9 July 2009 (EDT)
::I disagree. The paragraph is a good summary of the state of the GOP today. [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 17:43, 9 July 2009 (EDT)
:::But the article is meant as an encyclopedia article on the GOP, not a news article. The paragraph in question contains information that is not notable, and the corresponding facts from 1895 wouldn't make it into the article. [[User:Concernedchris|Concernedchris]] 07:28, 21 July 2009 (EDT)