Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 15:
Line 15: + + + + + + + + + +
The conservative position
Spelling, for a start. [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Template:Vandalcandidate&diff=68512&oldid=68509] Are you a student, or what? If you are a student, comments from 'the teacher' should not offend you; you ought to welcome them. And please fix my spelling errors, too! :-) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 10:16, 27 March 2007 (EDT)
Spelling, for a start. [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Template:Vandalcandidate&diff=68512&oldid=68509] Are you a student, or what? If you are a student, comments from 'the teacher' should not offend you; you ought to welcome them. And please fix my spelling errors, too! :-) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 10:16, 27 March 2007 (EDT)
== The conservative position ==
I'm not sure the goal of this project is to present only the conservative position on any topic. Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't the purpose of each article to present "trustworthy" information? I think this would include mentioning other viewpoints than conservative ones on certain topics.
Many topics are controversial, with a sharp split between liberal and conservative POV. I think the Schlaflys want both sides of controversies mentioned. Pending a confirmation that they '''do not''', please:
*do not add your template using the subst: keyword
*do check your idea of policy with [[User:Aschlafly]] or any other senior admin.
These are my detailed suggestions. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 10:23, 27 March 2007 (EDT)