550
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 39:
Line 39: + + + +
new edits
I didn't study the article history, but at the moment, this article is one paragraph of text, followed by four browser screens (my resolution and settings, YMMV) of literature. This doesn't seem to make any sense to me, and it's terribly unhelpful for any reader because it floods the senses, so to speak. Whoever wrote up that list should select maybe the five best books and the five best web resources and get rid of the rest. More is not always better. --[[User:KevinM|KevinM]] 14:50, 9 July 2008 (EDT)
I didn't study the article history, but at the moment, this article is one paragraph of text, followed by four browser screens (my resolution and settings, YMMV) of literature. This doesn't seem to make any sense to me, and it's terribly unhelpful for any reader because it floods the senses, so to speak. Whoever wrote up that list should select maybe the five best books and the five best web resources and get rid of the rest. More is not always better. --[[User:KevinM|KevinM]] 14:50, 9 July 2008 (EDT)
==New edits==
My edits to this article yesterday were reverted on the basis that I didn't discuss them first so here is my explanation. The purpose of my edits was improve the structure of the article by introducing new headlines and moving others. I also corrected some grammatical errors. I didn't introduce any new information, so the edits couldn't contain any lies. Having explained myself I will restore the reverted edits. --[[User:OscarJ|OscarJ]] 07:40, 2 August 2009 (EDT)