17
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 134:
Line 134: + + + + + + + + +
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 15:00, August 7, 2009
, 15:00, August 7, 2009→Riemann: new section
:Such edits would last a mere few minutes, if not mere seconds. Liberal, Conservapedia-hating editors would make sure of that (and they'd gang up to game the three-revert-rule to ensure their preferred viewpoint prevailed). [[User:Jinxmchue|Jinx McHue]] 20:49, 13 July 2009 (EDT)
:Such edits would last a mere few minutes, if not mere seconds. Liberal, Conservapedia-hating editors would make sure of that (and they'd gang up to game the three-revert-rule to ensure their preferred viewpoint prevailed). [[User:Jinxmchue|Jinx McHue]] 20:49, 13 July 2009 (EDT)
== Riemann ==
Wikipedia states:
:''In high school, Riemann studied the Bible intensively, but he was often distracted by mathematics. To this end, he even tried to prove mathematically the correctness of the Book of Genesis.''
And that's not a new contribution to the article. So this ''example of bias'' seems to be an example of sloppy research.
[[User:EMailNotMandatory|EMailNotMandatory]] 11:00, 7 August 2009 (EDT)