Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:  
| Adherents demonize their critics instead of taking objections seriously
 
| Adherents demonize their critics instead of taking objections seriously
 
| Scientific theories must withstand scrutiny
 
| Scientific theories must withstand scrutiny
 +
|-
 +
| There is little consensus on how evolution occurred
 +
| Scientific theories must command the consensus of the scientific community
 +
|-
 +
| Relies for support on fraud and hoaxes
 +
| Scientific method systematically roots out fraud
 +
|-
 +
| Metaphysical research program
 +
| Makes testable predictions
 +
|-
 +
| Cannot explain irreducible complexity, such as bacterial flagellum
 +
| Explains irreducible complexity
 +
|-
 +
| Leads to negative social effects, such as Nazism
 +
| Provides positive effects to society
 +
|-
 +
| Supported almost entirely by liberals and atheists
 +
| Doesn't depend on ideology
 
|}
 
|}
       
[[Category:Science]]
 
[[Category:Science]]
1,641

edits

Navigation menu