Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
example of need to use new terminology for new conservative insights
Line 1: Line 1:  
As of 2009 there is no fully [[conservative]] translation of the [[Bible]] which satisfies the following conditions:
 
As of 2009 there is no fully [[conservative]] translation of the [[Bible]] which satisfies the following conditions:
   −
* full use of [[Essay:Best New Conservative Terms|conservative terms]] as they develop
+
* full use of [[Essay:Best New Conservative Terms|conservative terms]] as they develop<ref>For example, in 1611 the [[conservative]] concept of "accountability" had not yet developed, and the [[King James Version]] does not use "accountable to God" in translating Romans 3:19; good modern translations do.</ref>
 
* conveying evil with its proper [[liberal]] language, such as using the term "gamble" rather than "cast lots"
 
* conveying evil with its proper [[liberal]] language, such as using the term "gamble" rather than "cast lots"
 
* excluding the liberal passages of doubtful authenticity, such as the [[adulteress story]]
 
* excluding the liberal passages of doubtful authenticity, such as the [[adulteress story]]
Line 14: Line 14:  
== See also ==
 
== See also ==
    +
* [[Bible Translations]]
 
* [[Bible Retranslation Project]]
 
* [[Bible Retranslation Project]]
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,341

edits

Navigation menu