nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
26,487
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 53:
Line 53: + + + +
Talk:Republican in name only (view source)
Revision as of 13:52, August 20, 2009
, 13:52, August 20, 2009→Article Guideline: new section
::We will revisit this issue at a later date if needed. She could be counted on during Republican majorities. As for today, idunno. [http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/members/b001228/votes/against-party/] --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 11:10, 18 August 2009 (EDT)
::We will revisit this issue at a later date if needed. She could be counted on during Republican majorities. As for today, idunno. [http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/members/b001228/votes/against-party/] --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 11:10, 18 August 2009 (EDT)
== Article Guideline ==
*'''Remember, please:''' The title of this article, "Republicans In Name Only" is just that. It is '''not''' "Conservatives In Name Only". What would qualify one person for an article of one name, wouldn't for the other. ;-) Thanks! ----[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 09:52, 20 August 2009 (EDT)