Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
145 bytes added ,  19:29, August 25, 2009
→‎NPOV: double standards
Line 22: Line 22:     
This statment comes from the man entrusted to enforce WP's policies.  In conclusion, I'm not an lawyer, I couldn't judge if WP's treatment of Harry Reid was an unreported campaign contribution. However, for encyclopedic and informational purposes, Conservapedia needs to offer the balanced POV that WP's own cabal has publicly abrogated.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 23:42, 24 August 2009 (EDT)
 
This statment comes from the man entrusted to enforce WP's policies.  In conclusion, I'm not an lawyer, I couldn't judge if WP's treatment of Harry Reid was an unreported campaign contribution. However, for encyclopedic and informational purposes, Conservapedia needs to offer the balanced POV that WP's own cabal has publicly abrogated.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 23:42, 24 August 2009 (EDT)
 +
 +
:Yeah, there use of double standards is egregious. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 15:29, 25 August 2009 (EDT)
Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650

edits

Navigation menu