Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
468 bytes added ,  20:18, August 27, 2009
An article doesn't get this bad by accidend - I need help here
Line 1: Line 1:  
The article should make some mention of a fourth kind - seasonal unemployment. I'll make some edits as soon as I have a chance. --[[User:Economist|Economist]] 19:26, 9 March 2009 (EDT)
 
The article should make some mention of a fourth kind - seasonal unemployment. I'll make some edits as soon as I have a chance. --[[User:Economist|Economist]] 19:26, 9 March 2009 (EDT)
 +
 +
==Bad writing==
 +
 +
Is the bad writing in this article deliberate? No one but socialists or liberals ever asserted that "can't find a job that pays what I want" is a measure of unemployment. If it did, then people on strike would be "unemployed". There are are other sloppy parts that look like deliberate insertions of biased or stupid stuff. Please help me fix this article. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 16:18, 27 August 2009 (EDT)
Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650

edits

Navigation menu