Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
378 bytes added ,  11:30, September 1, 2009
→‎Significance of the Case: Everyone agreed that interracial marriages were marriages
Line 20: Line 20:     
The case is also significant because it is about how the United States defined marriage. Before 1967, a legal marriage could not be contracted in states with anti-miscegenation laws if the partners were of different races. Thus the case redefined what constituted a marriage. Some proponents of [[gay rights]] have cited this case in support of a right to marriage <ref> Coolidge, David O, Playing the Loving Card: Same-Sex Marriage and the Politics of Analogy, BYU Journal of Public Law, 1998, 12 BYU.</ref> <ref>Pamela S. Karlan, "Loving ''Lawrence''", Stanford Law School.</ref>, although opponents argue that this is not viable as the 'Loving' marriage was still between a man and a woman.
 
The case is also significant because it is about how the United States defined marriage. Before 1967, a legal marriage could not be contracted in states with anti-miscegenation laws if the partners were of different races. Thus the case redefined what constituted a marriage. Some proponents of [[gay rights]] have cited this case in support of a right to marriage <ref> Coolidge, David O, Playing the Loving Card: Same-Sex Marriage and the Politics of Analogy, BYU Journal of Public Law, 1998, 12 BYU.</ref> <ref>Pamela S. Karlan, "Loving ''Lawrence''", Stanford Law School.</ref>, although opponents argue that this is not viable as the 'Loving' marriage was still between a man and a woman.
 +
 +
Here is an alternate view from a Catholic writer:
 +
:The definition of marriage was not at stake in Loving. Everyone agreed that [[interracial marriage]]s were marriages. Racists just wanted to ban them as part of the evil regime of [[white supremacy]] that the [[equal protection clause]] was designed to destroy. [http://www.catholiceducation.org/articles/marriage/mf0123.htm]
    
==Text of the Supreme Court decision: ''Loving v. Virginia''==
 
==Text of the Supreme Court decision: ''Loving v. Virginia''==
Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650

edits

Navigation menu