Changes

==NPOV==

==NPOV==

This article does more to approach WP's standards of NPOV than WP could even be expected of.  The section on his personal life counterbalances the section on his social work, where we are led to believe he was a selfless humanitarion, etc., repeated again in thousands and thousands of articles on his leadership of WPA, whereas we know he was driven by a lust for power.

This article does more to approach WP's standards of NPOV than WP could even be expected of.  The section on his personal life counterbalances the section on his social work, were we are led to beleive he was a selfless humanitataruion, etc., repeated again in thousands and thousandso of articles on his leadership of WPA, whereas we know is was driven by a lust for power.

So, the sole remaining issue in this man's life, was he a [[traitor]] or not?  The Trident conference was a summit of the head of government of Great Britain and its Commonwealth allies, Winston Churchill, accompanied by his chief aid, Lord Beaverbrook, and the U.S. head of government, Franklin Roosevelt, accompanied by his chief aid, Harry Hopkins. Because of the nature of the discussions, a Soviet and Comintern representative was ''not'' invited.  Yet the substance of the discussions is found in KGB hands.

So, the sole remaining issue in this man's life, was he a [[traitor]] or not?  The Trident conference was a summit of the head of government of Great Britain and its Commonwealth allies, Winston Churchill, accompanied by his chief aid, Lord Beaverbrook, and the U.S. head of government Franklin Roosevelt accompanied by his chief aid, Harry Hopkins. Because of the nature of the discussions, a Soviet and Comintern representative ''was not'' invited.  Yet the substance of the discussions is found in KGB hands.

So, one member of that group is guilty of violating the trust of several others.  Was it Churchill? Beaverbrook? FDR? or Hopkins?  As is the president's perogative, Hopkins could have been used as a diplomatic backchannel to the Kremlin.  In that plausible scenario the onus is then placed on FDR for betraying the trust and confidence Churchill put in him, not knowing his private comments would end up on Stalin's desk.  Whatever the case, either FDR, or Hopkins credibility is severely damaged by this decrypt.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 16:39, 5 September 2009 (EDT)

So, one member of that group is guilty of violating the trust of the several others.  Was it Churchill? Beaverbrook? FDR? or Hopkins?  As is the president's perogative, Hopkins could have been used as a backchannel diplomatic channel to the Kremlin.  In that plausible scenario the onus is then placed on FDR for betraying the trust and confidence Churchill put in him, not knowing his private comments would end up on Stalin's desk.  Whatever the case, either FDR, or Hopkins credibility is severely damaged by this decrypt.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 16:39, 5 September 2009 (EDT)

As is the president's perrogative

As is the president's perrogative