Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
165 bytes added ,  15:07, September 6, 2009
Line 113: Line 113:  
==Example: the National Debate over Health Care==
 
==Example: the National Debate over Health Care==
   −
By far the single biggest industry in the United States is health care (medical care).  It represents a massive one-sixth of our entire economy -- including expenditures of more than $2.2 ''trillion'' --  and costs are sharply increasing each year.  It has three major components: government-controlled (Medicare and Medicaid), insurance-controlled, and private pay or uninsured.  Many are unhappy with our system, yet it is in many ways the best in the world.  For example, the survival rate for the most prevalent form of cancer in men -- prostate cancer -- is 92% in the United States, but the survival rate for the same disease in England is only 51% under its government-controlled system.
+
By far the single biggest industry in the United States is health care (medical care).  It represents a massive one-sixth of our entire economy -- including annual expenditures of more than $2.2 ''trillion'' --  and costs are increasing each year.  It has three major components: government-controlled (Medicare and Medicaid), insurance-controlled, and private pay or uninsured.  Many are unhappy with our system, yet it is in many ways the best in the world.  For example, the survival rate for the most prevalent form of cancer in men -- prostate cancer -- is 92% in the United States, but the survival rate for the same disease in England is only 51% under its government-controlled system.
   −
Most other countries have some form of government-controlled, or socialized, medicine.  In the countries of Canada, North Korea and Cuba, it is actually illegal to pay money to a doctor simply to see you.  The government control there is so great that you can only see a doctor paid by the government in those countries.  In England, there is a two-tiered system: good care is provided to those who can afford to pay for it, and free but inferior care is provided by the government to those who cannot.
+
Most other countries have some form of government-controlled, or socialized, medicine.  In the countries of Canada, North Korea and Cuba, it is actually illegal to pay money to a doctor simply to see you.  You can see only a doctor paid by the government in those countries.  In England, there is a two-tiered system: good care is provided to the few who can afford to pay for it, and free but inferior care is provided by the government to the vast majority who cannot.  This government-controlled medical care became law in England due to hardships created by World War II, when the government was controlling most of the English economy.  The English accepted government control of medicine just as they accepted government control and rationing of nearly everything else.
   −
If an elderly Canadian is vacationing in Florida and falls and breaks his hip, which is very painful, the Canadian system of health care will not even reimburse the patient for surgery at the nearest hospital.  Instead, the patient must fly back to Canada in excruciating pain to be operated on by a government-controlled doctor there.
+
If an elderly Canadian is vacationing in Florida and falls and breaks her hip, which is very painful, the Canadian system of health care will not even reimburse the patient for surgery at the nearest hospital.  Instead, the patient must fly back to Canada in excruciating pain to be operated on by a government-controlled doctor there.
   −
The Canadian government took over the health care system and it is now illegal to pay money to see a doctor.  (In the United States, under the free market, anyone can pay their own money for medical care at any time; there is an immediate care, cash-based doctors' office within a half-mile of our classroom.)
+
In the United States, under the free market, anyone can pay their own money for medical care at any time; there is an immediate care, cash-based doctors' office within a half-mile of our classroom. But in Canada, someone with an illness is typically put on a waiting list and, depending on his age and likelihood of survival, may not see a doctor for months.  In some cases, patients pass away before they obtain the treatment they need.  The Canadian sets limits on wages and prices, and that causes shortages because there is always less supply when the price is lower.  (Look again at the shape of the supply curve:  at lower P, there is lower Q).  Lowering the wages and prices prevents supply from rising to satisfy demand.  What happens this is that demand is much greater than supply, patients have to wait a long time to see a doctor.  There is a lower survival rate from cancer in Canada than the United States because of the delays in diagnosis and treatment there.
In Canada, someone with an illness is typically put on a waiting list and, depending on his age and likelihood of survival, may not see a doctor for months.  In some cases, patients pass away before they obtain the treatment they need.  The Canadian sets limits on wages and prices, and that causes shortages because there is always less supply when the price is lower.  (Look again at the shape of the supply curve:  at lower P, there is lower Q).  Lowering the wages and prices prevents supply from rising to satisfy demand.  What happens this is that demand is much greater than supply, patients have to wait a long time to see a doctor.  There is a lower survival rate from cancer in Canada than the United States because of the delays in diagnosis and treatment there.
      
This limiting of supply by government-set pricing causes what is known as "rationing".  More people want the service (a medical operation or treatment) than is available.  A waiting list is created to handle the surplus in demand over supply.  But when someone has a cancer growing inside of him, delay by being placed on a waiting list can be agonizing and deadly.  Quick treatment helps improve survival from cancer.  In the United States, where government does not set prices and there is not any rationing yet, the survival rate for five common forms of cancer is over 90%.  Thanks to the powerful benefits of the free market, the rate of survival continues to improve in the United States.
 
This limiting of supply by government-set pricing causes what is known as "rationing".  More people want the service (a medical operation or treatment) than is available.  A waiting list is created to handle the surplus in demand over supply.  But when someone has a cancer growing inside of him, delay by being placed on a waiting list can be agonizing and deadly.  Quick treatment helps improve survival from cancer.  In the United States, where government does not set prices and there is not any rationing yet, the survival rate for five common forms of cancer is over 90%.  Thanks to the powerful benefits of the free market, the rate of survival continues to improve in the United States.
Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,790

edits

Navigation menu