Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
294,396
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 2:
Line 2: + + Line 35:
Line 37: + + + + + + + + + + +
Budenz
A front organization is operated in two ways: either the Communists infiltrate an organization, work inside it (in Marxist language, the revolutionary mole burrows beneath the surface to "bore from within")<ref>[http://www.pww.org/article/articleview/12302/1/405 ''After Iowa'', [[Frank Chapman]], [[People's Weekly World]] Letters, Jan. 12, 2008].</ref> and eventually capture it; or they form their own organization - and simply invite the gullible in. In either case, many unsuspecting people wind up working to further some specific Communist objective.
A front organization is operated in two ways: either the Communists infiltrate an organization, work inside it (in Marxist language, the revolutionary mole burrows beneath the surface to "bore from within")<ref>[http://www.pww.org/article/articleview/12302/1/405 ''After Iowa'', [[Frank Chapman]], [[People's Weekly World]] Letters, Jan. 12, 2008].</ref> and eventually capture it; or they form their own organization - and simply invite the gullible in. In either case, many unsuspecting people wind up working to further some specific Communist objective.
==Browder on fronts==
In 1960 General Secretary [[Earl Browder]] described the success the [[CPUSA]] enjoyed in the use of front organizations: wrote in 1960,
In 1960 General Secretary [[Earl Browder]] described the success the [[CPUSA]] enjoyed in the use of front organizations: wrote in 1960,
"We revolutionary workers, it appears to me, should not be shy about using the same tactics . . .<ref>Georgi Dimitroff, The United Front (New York, International Publishers, 1938), p. 52, quoted from a report to the Seventh World Congress (August 1935).</ref><ref>William A. Nolan, ''Communism Versus the Negro'' (Chicago, Henry Regnery Company, 1951), p. 115.</ref>}}
"We revolutionary workers, it appears to me, should not be shy about using the same tactics . . .<ref>Georgi Dimitroff, The United Front (New York, International Publishers, 1938), p. 52, quoted from a report to the Seventh World Congress (August 1935).</ref><ref>William A. Nolan, ''Communism Versus the Negro'' (Chicago, Henry Regnery Company, 1951), p. 115.</ref>}}
==Budenz on fronts==
Soviet defector [[Louis Budenz]] describes how fronts then use [[communist publications]] to shape and influence public opinion.
{{Cquote [I]t is the Communists' hidden influence on American [public] opinion that has been most devastating. I can speak with full authority on that matter, having been deeply engaged in directing and executing [[Moscow]]'s orders for molding American thinking. Repeatedly...orders went out to form this committee and that, to set up groups of citizens with patriotic names and allegedly patriotic objectives. Then these committees, headed by steeled Communists from the "branches," would roll up huge numbers of letters and telegrams from all sections of the land - with a view to influencing Congressmen and securing the passage or defeat of some particular piece of legislation.
Thousands of loyal Americans, in the name of "civil liberties," "rights," "fascist abuse of labor," are thus inveigled by the Communists into support of moves and measures which build up the enemies of all liberty. And the end is not yet; even now, as I hope to make clear, new committees under new names are pounding on the doors of Congress and the courts. Each of their insistent demands aids the Communists in undermining the nation.
The energy that marks such campaigning is engendered by the ''[[Daily Worker]]'' through devices which again arouse the laughter of the unthinking. Anyone who picks up that paper today will be arrested by the foul abuse which characterizes its columns and which is hurled at all those with whom the Reds disagree. So extreme are these vilifications that a casual reader will find it hard to believe that anything could be gained by such foulness, which must offend a great many people. Nevertheless much is gained by it. Through this excessive appeal to hatred, the Red newspaper whips up its readers (who live on a philosophy of [[hate]]) to induce others to get busy. In working on others, the faithful ''Daily Worker'' readers do not use the same phrases, as a rule; that would be ineffective. But the spleen developed in them by what they have read is transmitted in action to those they meet in shop, neighborhood or community. The device is one that wins - if used in a steeled army of agents for a foreign power, and among a trusting population such as ours.<ref>Louis F. Budenz, ''Men Without Faces'', Harper & Brothers, 1950, pp. 25-26. (pp. 14-15 pdf)</ref>}}
==See also==
==See also==