Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
sign
Line 11: Line 11:  
This is disputable; Clinton only got 42% and a deficit hawk like Perot can hardly be considered un-conservative. It simply was Democrats winning out in the bidding war for domestic spending priorities in the post-Cold War era.  Republicans and conservatives can never out-bid or out spend Democrats and liberals on domestic social spending.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 20:39, 10 September 2009 (EDT)
 
This is disputable; Clinton only got 42% and a deficit hawk like Perot can hardly be considered un-conservative. It simply was Democrats winning out in the bidding war for domestic spending priorities in the post-Cold War era.  Republicans and conservatives can never out-bid or out spend Democrats and liberals on domestic social spending.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 20:39, 10 September 2009 (EDT)
 
::the backlash was seen in Bush's very poor showing--he lost millions of votes he had won in 1992. The analysis is from Lipset, one of the leading conservative political scientists.
 
::the backlash was seen in Bush's very poor showing--he lost millions of votes he had won in 1992. The analysis is from Lipset, one of the leading conservative political scientists.
 +
[[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 20:41, 10 September 2009 (EDT)
17,394

edits

Navigation menu