Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
295,463
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 19:
Line 19: − +
Talk:United States presidential election, 1992 (view source)
Revision as of 01:46, September 11, 2009
, 01:46, September 11, 2009→a backlash against 12 years of a conservative presidency
::::And this statement, "''After the election, economic numbers came out showing that the recession had actually ended before the election, but the public did not have this information when they voted. '' simply is not true. The Bureau of Economic Anylsis declared the mild recession over in March 1991, eighteen months prior to the election. the liberal/commie media didn't highlight it, but rather spewed DNC & Clinton trash as facts. [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 21:01, 10 September 2009 (EDT)
::::And this statement, "''After the election, economic numbers came out showing that the recession had actually ended before the election, but the public did not have this information when they voted. '' simply is not true. The Bureau of Economic Anylsis declared the mild recession over in March 1991, eighteen months prior to the election. the liberal/commie media didn't highlight it, but rather spewed DNC & Clinton trash as facts. [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 21:01, 10 September 2009 (EDT)
:::::Well the text follows Alan Greenspan, who says "the economy was recovering, just not in time to save the election." (''Age of Turbulence'' p 122) The Bush's poor speeches and his sad advertising campaign should have been hollering success, but instead ignored the economy. 21:26, 10 September 2009 (EDT)
:::::Well the text follows Alan Greenspan, who says "the economy was recovering, just not in time to save the election." (''Age of Turbulence'' p 122) The Bush's poor speeches and his sad advertising campaign should have been hollering success, but instead ignored the economy. 21:26, 10 September 2009 (EDT)
::::::Point is, in the pre-Windows 95 Internet age, all information ''was'' available, only the mainstream sources theat people depended on not only ''did not'' report it, they did report Clinton's assertions such "worst economy in 50 years" etc. without challenging it. Today there's things like Fact Check, etc., in those days it was pure unadulterated media bias. [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 21:44, 10 September 2009 (EDT)
::::::Point is, in the pre-Windows 95 Internet age, all the information ''was'' available, only the mainstream sources that people depend on not only ''did not'' report it, they did report Clinton's assertions such "worst economy in 50 years" etc. without challenging it. Today there's things like Fact Check, etc., in those days it was pure unadulterated media bias. [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 21:44, 10 September 2009 (EDT)