2,732
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 9:
Line 9: + +
no edit summary
: Scalia's opinion of Brown v Education might be relevant, if it were known. As is, mentioning Brown just confuses. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 01:44, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
: Scalia's opinion of Brown v Education might be relevant, if it were known. As is, mentioning Brown just confuses. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 01:44, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
:: Ummm... it's a citation to an established legal principle known as responsivism. Andy, your arrogance (or ignorance?) in ignoring actual legal fact is shocking. Has your worldview really sent your mind spinning that far?-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 02:18, 28 March 2007 (EDT)