58
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 584:
Line 584: + + + +
Talk:Counterexamples to Evolution (view source)
Revision as of 13:21, September 14, 2009
, 13:21, September 14, 2009no edit summary
We don't allow ideological [[censorship]] here. Try Wikipedia if you want to insist on censoring criticism of evolution, though I oppose censorship by Wikipedia also.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 21:51, 7 March 2009 (EST)
We don't allow ideological [[censorship]] here. Try Wikipedia if you want to insist on censoring criticism of evolution, though I oppose censorship by Wikipedia also.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 21:51, 7 March 2009 (EST)
==Jellyfish fact==
The article appears to lapse into the faulty "god of the gaps" way of thinking here. If the article is willing to state that the phenomenon is only "apparently" unrelated to 'evolution'. I've always felt the integrity of a conservative argument is based on the percentage of unimpeachable truths within (as opposed to the liberal priorities placed on 1. quotes from famous peoples and 2. quotes from liars) so if you don't mind, I would like to trim down the list to only those statements which are ironclad. [[User:MICasey|MICasey]] 09:21, 14 September 2009 (EDT)