Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 183: Line 183:     
[[User:BenP|BenP]] 16:05, 2 May 2008 (EST)
 
[[User:BenP|BenP]] 16:05, 2 May 2008 (EST)
 +
 +
I Believe in the direction BenP is going...but I personally don't think it should even be allowed on public property; private is most certainly allowed. Reason being this: while BenP understands that "some taxpayers are being required to pay for speech they don't support" you also have to remember that the public property has to be maintained with taxpayers money as well. And it is public property, not christian property. I certainly wouldn't want my walk in the park infested with billboards of multitudes of faiths vying for my attention.
11

edits

Navigation menu