Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,795
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 18:
Line 18: + + + +
Talk:Merriam-Webster (view source)
Revision as of 16:14, September 18, 2009
, 16:14, September 18, 2009inclined to revert
::Calm down, Prenvolost. We all know that the online edition can depart from print editions. It sounds like you're trying to play gotcha, but we don't do that here. If you want to clue us in about something, don't hit us with a clue stick but phase your suggestions politely. Then you'll be welcome to stick around. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 12:12, 18 September 2009 (EDT)
::Calm down, Prenvolost. We all know that the online edition can depart from print editions. It sounds like you're trying to play gotcha, but we don't do that here. If you want to clue us in about something, don't hit us with a clue stick but phase your suggestions politely. Then you'll be welcome to stick around. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 12:12, 18 September 2009 (EDT)
== Inclined to Revert ==
Many informative items have just been ''removed'' by one editor from this entry. While each one in isolation can be debatable, taken as a whole this seems to be a misguided censoring of information. Here we let the reader decide. Any reason not to revert these changes as a whole?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 12:14, 18 September 2009 (EDT)