Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 31: Line 31:  
:Since you bring up [[irony]], do you also consider it ironic that mainstream Hollywood and television has been artificially promoting homosexual characters (the [[token gay]]) to make it seem like they commonly exist among the general public, when in fact most decent people have not actually willfully encountered homosexuals? They make it seem like everyone has a gay friend or uncle or mailman, which is ironic to me, considering I don't have any gay friends, relatives, dentists or firefighters. Just good, honest, Christians. If you can't spot the liberal homosexual obsession, then you've already been duped, I'm sad to say. I'd encourage you to read some more insights, if you can bear the "irony". -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 17:00, 17 March 2009 (EDT)
 
:Since you bring up [[irony]], do you also consider it ironic that mainstream Hollywood and television has been artificially promoting homosexual characters (the [[token gay]]) to make it seem like they commonly exist among the general public, when in fact most decent people have not actually willfully encountered homosexuals? They make it seem like everyone has a gay friend or uncle or mailman, which is ironic to me, considering I don't have any gay friends, relatives, dentists or firefighters. Just good, honest, Christians. If you can't spot the liberal homosexual obsession, then you've already been duped, I'm sad to say. I'd encourage you to read some more insights, if you can bear the "irony". -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 17:00, 17 March 2009 (EDT)
 
::"An irony that is lost on the publishers" indeed.  --[[User:Jfavor|Jfavor]] 21:55, 19 May 2009 (EDT)
 
::"An irony that is lost on the publishers" indeed.  --[[User:Jfavor|Jfavor]] 21:55, 19 May 2009 (EDT)
 +
 +
==  JPatt?!?!? What are you doing!?!?! ==
 +
 +
Redirecting the article on homosexual obsession to Sarah Palin? Is this a mistake? [[User:Wayne|Wayne]] 18:04, 22 September 2009 (EDT)
84

edits

Navigation menu