55
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 30:
Line 30: + + +
Debate:Is the American Occupation of the Hawaiian Islands justified? (view source)
Revision as of 00:39, September 24, 2009
, 00:39, September 24, 2009no edit summary
==Yes And No==
==Yes And No==
Although the US did technically steal Hawai'i from the Hawaiians, we have not oppressed them or their culture, I don't see any real harm. Also due to the US federalistic government, as a state they maintain a high degree of self-government and security from the federal government. And, with time there was a good chance they would have joined the Union anyways. --[[User:Snotbowst|Snotbowst]] 14:29, 17 May 2008 (EDT)
Although the US did technically steal Hawai'i from the Hawaiians, we have not oppressed them or their culture, I don't see any real harm. Also due to the US federalistic government, as a state they maintain a high degree of self-government and security from the federal government. And, with time there was a good chance they would have joined the Union anyways. --[[User:Snotbowst|Snotbowst]] 14:29, 17 May 2008 (EDT)
The Country was first taken over by a coupe d'etat instigated by Hawaiian businessmen. Although I wish Hawaii remained independent, it was not wholly America's fault. Hawaii asked to be annexed as an U.S. territory. [[Baronvonbob]]
[[Category:Conservapedia Debates]]
[[Category:Conservapedia Debates]]