1,019
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 9:
Line 9: + +
Conservapedia talk:Keep Richard Around? (view source)
Revision as of 13:11, March 28, 2007
, 13:11, March 28, 2007→'''Block:'''
::Conservapedia needed a public slap in the face. Heck, even now, Andy is all smug and pretends that nothing is wrong. This thing should have started a serious debate among sysops (You guys are supposed to be examples for the community, yet what happened last night? Some of the "liberals that should be monitored" were engaging in a constructive discussion about improving the site policies while you and Karajou were whining about him having lied. Not even to mention your utterly pointless protection/block war.) about things like security, reaction and rules. Instead, "you" (read: the sysop collective, and especially Andy) seem to consider the case to be closed (with the exception of your ominous discussion about "certain people" being warned and stuff - may I ask who you guys meant? I hope that the idiot who nominated me for Richard's list is one of them!).
::Conservapedia needed a public slap in the face. Heck, even now, Andy is all smug and pretends that nothing is wrong. This thing should have started a serious debate among sysops (You guys are supposed to be examples for the community, yet what happened last night? Some of the "liberals that should be monitored" were engaging in a constructive discussion about improving the site policies while you and Karajou were whining about him having lied. Not even to mention your utterly pointless protection/block war.) about things like security, reaction and rules. Instead, "you" (read: the sysop collective, and especially Andy) seem to consider the case to be closed (with the exception of your ominous discussion about "certain people" being warned and stuff - may I ask who you guys meant? I hope that the idiot who nominated me for Richard's list is one of them!).
::Right now, your main concern should not be to gloat at a banned user who can't reply. It should be how to handle the fact that several good contributors are leaving the site in disgust. --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 09:00, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
::Right now, your main concern should not be to gloat at a banned user who can't reply. It should be how to handle the fact that several good contributors are leaving the site in disgust. --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 09:00, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
:::Who ''did'' nominate you, anyway? As I recall, it was another sysop. [[User:Tsumetai|Tsumetai]] 09:11, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
=='''Keep:''' ==
=='''Keep:''' ==