Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 4: Line 4:     
:For the record—and since I’m sick of seeing “liberal” used to describe any behavior we don’t like—Richard does not describe himself as liberal—in fact in his post about this issue he writes: “I still don't consider myself a "liberal" (except in the classic sense) as I'm no fan of socialism nor do I buy the concept of "economic justice". <ref>Richard’s post [http://linuxintegrators.com/acoliver/blog/2007/03/27/x-0310.html]</ref>.  “Liberal” has a meaning, and that meaning is not “anything I don’t like”.--[[User:Reginod|Reginod]] 09:08, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
 
:For the record—and since I’m sick of seeing “liberal” used to describe any behavior we don’t like—Richard does not describe himself as liberal—in fact in his post about this issue he writes: “I still don't consider myself a "liberal" (except in the classic sense) as I'm no fan of socialism nor do I buy the concept of "economic justice". <ref>Richard’s post [http://linuxintegrators.com/acoliver/blog/2007/03/27/x-0310.html]</ref>.  “Liberal” has a meaning, and that meaning is not “anything I don’t like”.--[[User:Reginod|Reginod]] 09:08, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
::Everything he wrote is accurate. He just left other things out and phrased it in such a way that it comes off as a fawning lovenote to the guy instead of a genuine critique. Which, again, is the whole point. TPTB (and esp. Andy) were all content to let it stand b/c he had the "proper" political viewpoint. Andy even SysOped him b/c of this article. Isn't THAT the issue you should be more concerned about? It's like a doctor just revealed a tumor and you're more concerned about the doctor finding it than finding a cure.--[[User:Dave3172|Dave3172]] 09:28, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 
----
 
----
  
433

edits

Navigation menu