Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
100 bytes added ,  16:02, March 28, 2007
Line 245: Line 245:     
::MatteeNeutra, these dates, and supposed identification of plants '11,000' years old, and whatever, are based on improper Carbon14 Dating, which is even called into question by secularist authorities.  [[http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/sci;308/5728/1551]]  There's a very thorough walk-through, here, at Answers In Creation that explains why relying on these date ''estimates'' can be so problematic. [[http://www.answersincreation.org/carbondating.htm]]  It isn't that this time, as you say, could have ''disappeared,'' it is that this time never was, because it only existed in the false measurements of secularist scientists.  [[User:DunsScotus|DunsScotus]] 11:59, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
 
::MatteeNeutra, these dates, and supposed identification of plants '11,000' years old, and whatever, are based on improper Carbon14 Dating, which is even called into question by secularist authorities.  [[http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/sci;308/5728/1551]]  There's a very thorough walk-through, here, at Answers In Creation that explains why relying on these date ''estimates'' can be so problematic. [[http://www.answersincreation.org/carbondating.htm]]  It isn't that this time, as you say, could have ''disappeared,'' it is that this time never was, because it only existed in the false measurements of secularist scientists.  [[User:DunsScotus|DunsScotus]] 11:59, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::Answers in Creation is an '''OEC''' site. [[User:Tsumetai|Tsumetai]] 12:02, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
1,019

edits

Navigation menu