2,732
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 17:
Line 17: + +
no edit summary
: Write an article on responsive interpretation if you want, but don't attribute views to Scalia unless you can prove it. Scalia is not bashful about expressing his opinions, so you should be able to quote him if you are correct. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 12:51, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
: Write an article on responsive interpretation if you want, but don't attribute views to Scalia unless you can prove it. Scalia is not bashful about expressing his opinions, so you should be able to quote him if you are correct. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 12:51, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
Reply to my point or give up. I did prove it.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 13:00, 28 March 2007 (EDT)